The path forward

Climate scientists who ostensibly agree on the scale and scope of climate change are at odds over the best solution to the problem. In particular, several scientists have adamantly debated the role of nuclear energy and renewable energy.

I put together a three-part series on this issue, looking at the case for nuclear energy, profiling a scientist who says we can save the world with just renewables, and examining why the debate has become so heated

A cooling tower at the Callaway Nuclear Power Plant in Missouri

A cooling tower at the Callaway Nuclear Power Plant in Missouri

Move the goalposts

Many researchers and policy makers agree that climate change is a problem, but are still debating the ultimate goal. International negotiations typically focus on keeping warming below 2 degrees Celsius, but some analysts argue that this goal leaves too much wiggle room.

Instead, they argue the objective should be to race to zero carbon emissions, a goal that compels everyone to act.